Leadership in Biotech

Tag: costs

Illustration of a scientist considering the effects of depreciation on the pipette she is considering buying

How expenses and depreciation can affect the profitability of your scientific work

In this post, we’re continuing our foray into the Income Statement, focusing on expenses. Our dive into expenses will include Research and Development (R&D) expenses, near and dear to any scientist. 

Let’s return once again to the now quite familiar BioTechne Income Statement:

Screenshot of Bio-Techne Income Statement

The second block of items in the Income Statement enumerates Operating Expenses. These are broken down into ‘Sales, General, and Administrative’ (sometimes you see this referred to as SG&A or G&A) and ‘Research and Development.’ Note that the line items here can change depending on the type of business you are in. If sales is a large part of your business, you may choose to have Sales as its own line, and G&A kept separate. Some business sectors may not pull out R&D as a separate line item, but this would be highly unusual for Life Science businesses, as R&D is a crucial part of our business models.

An important aspect of G&A for R&D leaders to understand is depreciation and amortization. How these expenses are handled can GREATLY impact the profit seen in an income statement. And while we’ll talk more about profit in the next section, I do want to pause briefly on the depreciation and amortization handling here.

Depreciation and amortization

First, some definitions. If you are like me, depreciation already feels like a somewhat familiar concept. Depreciation refers to both (1) the decrease in the value of assets over time and (2) the method used to reallocate, or “write down” the cost of a tangible asset (such as equipment) over its useful life span. In accounting, we are referring to the second of those definitions. Amortization is the same basic concept as depreciation, except it applies to intangible assets like patents, copyrights, and trade secrets.

To really understand depreciation and amortization, we need to resurrect ‘The Matching Principle’ referenced in the first post on the income statement. The matching principle seeks to match the cost with its associated revenue to determine profits in a given time period. For instance: you buy a fancy new Illumina Sequencer this year, but the expectation is that it will help to bring in revenue for the next 5+ years, so some percentage of that initial cost of the sequencer needs to be recorded in future income statements. But how long exactly will this sequencer be (1) functional and (2) part of your clinical workflow? What the accountants decide can have a huge impact on the profit in the income statement.

Here’s a worked example. Let’s say you bought a NovaSeqX recently that put you back a cool $1M. Now let’s consider three different ways of approaching depreciation and see how it impacts profit for an imaginary CRO business in which you generate $900K in revenue and incur $500K in direct costs (technician salaries, reagents, etc) and $300K in overhead (rent, marketing, etc) in a given quarter. Scenario 1: we assume the sequencer will last us 5 years, so we depreciate it by $50K per quarter (cost – salvage value) / useful life; for simplicity I am assuming a $0 salvage value). Scenario 2: we assume the sequencer will last us 2 years, which then gives us $125K per quarter depreciation. Scenario 3: we assume we’ll be using this sequencer for the next 10 years, which puts quarterly depreciation at $25K per quarter. In the table below, you can see that in scenario 2, this business is now operating in the red, whereas things look pretty rosy in scenario 3.

(in $1000)Scenario 1Scenario 2Scenario 3
Revenue900900900
Cost of goods sold500500500
Gross Profit400400400
Expenses300300300
Depreciation5012525
Net Profit50-2575

There are two things to take away from this example: (1) profit can be significantly influenced by the assumptions you make in depreciation and amortization and (2) these assumptions should be part of considerations to make significant capital investments. So next time you argue for a capital investment, keep in mind how it will impact your company’s income statement, financial health, and, ultimately, also the stock price.  

In the next part of this series, we’ll take a more complete look at a company’s profitability. In the meantime, you can sign up to the mailing list to be updated when the next installment is out.

Income Statement Fun: What is included in the Cost of Sales and why you should care

In this post, we’ll continue our foray into the Income Statement and dig into costs and expenses, part 1: ‘Cost of Sales.’

Let’s go back to the BioTechne Income Statement from last time:

Screenshot of Bio-Techne Income Statement

You have net sales (revenue) at the very top, followed by the cost of these sales. Recall that one of the first things we learned about BioTechne was that ‘Bio-Techne Corporation is a global life sciences company that provides products and services for research and clinical diagnostics. Because they provide both products AND services, the cost of sales here includes both the Cost of Goods, or CoGs, that many of us are familiar with (i.e., the raw materials used in manufacturing) and Cost of Services.

Just like with revenue, there is nuance to what is and is not included in ‘Cost of Sales.’ And these nuances are important for anyone leading a scientific (or even operations) function to understand because it can frame the performance of your department to corporate and play into how your department’s targets are set.

Here are three examples:

  1. Let’s say you run a Biopharma-focused informatics team at a diagnostics company. A large part of what your team does is interface with your biopharma clients to understand their needs and return the right kind of analysis. But you also work on algorithms that are used in your company’s core bioinformatics pipeline. Finance could reasonably justify putting your team’s salaries as either part of the ‘cost of services’ or part of ‘R&D.’ This choice, however, will heavily influence how much scrutiny there is, as things ‘above the line’ (i.e., in the first block of items on the income statement) usually face far more scrutiny than those below the line, especially if your margins are low.
  2. Let’s say you run a scientific operations team. You will probably have specific CoGs targets to hit each quarter that are a big part of how you and your team are evaluated. In reviewing the numbers, you realize that there is an item around ‘contract administration’ listed against your CoGs. Does it belong there? Can you reclass that as G&A (general and administration)? If you do, your numbers are going to suddenly look better, so in a bad quarter, you may be tempted to push for a reclass.
  3. Imagine you are in charge of running a CLIA lab at a diagnostics company. Some part of the environmental controls (i.e., air conditioning and heating) control the temperature of the CLIA lab space, and some part is used for the office space. What portion is attributed to ‘Cost of Sales’ and what portion should go under G&A (general and administration)? Do you use square footage? Do you allocate the cost in the same way for IT expenses?

Just like with revenue recognition, there is a large amount of discretion allowed here, but it’s also easy to see how things can get wonky.

That’s the basics for costs. We’ll go through expenses in the next post. As always, you can join the mailing list so you don’t miss it!

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén